Amazing Health Benefits of Artichokes; 1 ) Cancer Prevention - Treatment and Cure: Studies done with artichoke leaf extract have found that they induce apoptosis (cell death) and reduce cell proliferation in many different forms of cancer, including Prostate cancer, Leukemia, and Breast cancer. A diet rich in the flavanoids present in artichokes reduces the risk of breast cancer. Why? Because it buffers the cause of cancer - ACID!
2 ) High in Antioxidants of Anti-ACIDS: Artichokes have more antioxidants or antacids than any other vegetable and they ranked seventh in a study of the antioxidant levels of 1,000 different foods. Some of the powerful antioxidants or antacids in artichokes are quercertin, rutin, anthocyanins, cynarin, luteolin, and silymarin.
We are hearing more about people going to India and other parts of Asia to get hip replacement and other medical procedures due to the expense and lack of coverage available in the US. This seemed like an interesting concept to me until I found I need to travel myself to find the type of treatment that is most appropriate for my disease. I hear and read about other carcinoid patients traveling to Europe to get treatments that are not available in the US.
On my last phone call with Dr. Ratner a few weeks ago, he said that he would like to do an octreoscan to help locate my primary tumor. This procedure is the standard of care in the US for evaluation of tumor location. It also defines if the patient has the proper receptors for some of the radiopeptide therapies available as treatment. If I were diagnosed with carcinoid tumors and lived in Europe or Asia, my doctor would most likely recommend a PET with 68Ga-DOTA-TOC instead of an octreoscan. This scan has been used in Europe for the past several years and it is widely believed by most of the medical community that the 68Ga-DOTATOC PET is superior to 111In-DTPAOC SPECT (Octreoscan).
The FDA has not approved the PET with 68Ga-DOTA-TOC in the US at this point. There are however, two locations that are offering this scan as a clinical trial: Vanderbilt University in Nashville and The University of Iowa in Iowa City. The problem with the clinical trial is that it may not be covered by standard medical insurance.
Last week I called VanderbiltUniversity to see if I would be eligible for a 68-GA PET scan. I asked whether they would accept me since I had never had an octreoscan. Nor did I know if I had the proper receptors for this scan to work. I needed to know whether it would be covered by my insurance and if not, how much it would cost. Finally, I asked how long it would take to get the scan and what other information they required. They informed they were scheduling for July. They also needed to confirm my diagnosis by having me submit the most recent CT scan report, the pathology reports, the most recent labs and medical notes from my Dr. If I were deemed eligible, they would verify if my insurance would cover this. If not, the cost would be about $2,600. I would need to be in Nashville for two days, one for the labs, Dr. appointment and scan and the next day for another Dr. appointment discussing the results.
After sending all this information, they informed me that I was indeed eligible and confirmed my July appointment. I had an appointment with Dr. Ratner yesterday and told him I preferred the 68Ga-DOTA-TOC scan to an octreoscan. He was quite happy that I had taken the initiative to do this and he agreed it was a much better scan. He told me they were trying to raise the funds to get this technology at Mount Sinai Medical Center. I now feel much better about the doctor after this appointment because he took the time to let me ask questions and does not object to having a patient that is interested in new treatments. No arrogance or attitude there.
I am hoping that this scan will help me to find the primary tumor. While I am in Nashville, I will be meeting with Dr. Eric Liu who will examine my case and advise on future treatment. I am now in a much better frame of mind about my situation, doctor and treatment, even though nothing has really changed since last week.
I understand that an octreoscan costs about $8,500, with insurance covering all of it. The 68Ga-DOTA-TOC scan costs $2,600, does a better job, is not widely available and is probably not covered by insurance. Only in America…
A few weeks ago I posted a message on the Association of Cancer Online Resources (ACOR) listserv for carcinoids asking about debulking surgery and other invasive procedures used to remove tumors. This post got a lot of responses, both on and off list. I am in a situation where my first oncologist and carcinoid specialist did not think a big surgery was appropriate in my case. I am no longer seeing him – see my previous post and have moved on to a new oncologist and carcinoid specialist who treats more aggressively. Although he has not told me specifically that I should have this large surgery, primarily because I have not been able to get an appointment to see him (see my previous post), I do think he will be recommending this option.
From the beginning of this cancer journey, I have been finding that treatment options are quite diverse and depending on the Dr., they will look at your labs, pathology and scans and come up with widely different treatment plans.
Part of how I (and I'd think most patients) feel about treatment is due to our prior experiences and general personality and genetic disposition. I have always been what I would call a medical minimalist and doubter, meaning that I do not go seeking medical attention very often and I tend to avoid drugs or use them quite selectively. My primary care and on-gyn are also minimalists in their thoughts about treatment – i.e., it took my ob-gyn and me about 12 years from the time I started having medical issues with my uterine fibroids to making the decision to have my uterus removed by abdominal hysterectomy. I was fine with this approach whereas another Dr. might have pushed the surgery much sooner.
A few months ago, I read an excerpt from a book called Your Medical Mind: How to Decide What is Right for You by Dr. Pamela Hartzband and Dr. Jerome Groopman. The terms miminalist and doubter as opposed to maximalist and believer come from their book (I have not read the book). I thought this particular passage was helpful:
“For patients and experts alike, there is a subjective core to every medical decision. The truth is that, despite many advances, much of medicine still exists in a gray zone where there is not one right answer. No one can say with certainty who will benefit by taking a certain drug and who will not. Nor can we say with certainty what impact a medical condition will have on someone’s life or how they might experience a treatment’s side effects. The path to maintaining or regaining health is not the same for everyone; our preferences really do matter.”
I took some liberties with this thinking and put the chart below together to think about how to classify medical preferences. It’s a bit like a Myers-Briggs for patient/doctor classification.
Minimalists
Maximalists
Doubters
Believers
Treatment may be worse than the disease
Want to do everything possible
Less is more
Try everything
Less drugs/procedures
More drugs/procedures
Having cancer is altogether different from anything I’ve ever had before in that this is a chronic disease, not a one time issue that can be treated and then forgotten about. This is my first time being so deeply involved in the medical field and I have been quite disconcerted with what I have found so far.
Many Drs. get paid by pharmaceutical companies to prescribe drugs, whether the patient needs them or not. Many Drs. publish papers/research because they need to get tenure or a promotion and the research findings are not true. These findings get a lot of publicity via media but the follow-up which is that the research is not true is not covered by the same media. Most research is funded by pharmaceutical companies so Drs. are paid not to find cures or treatments that don’t involve drugs or their research funding will dry up.
Part of my cynicism comes from the fact that I have been working in the financial services industry – Wall Street buy side – for almost 31 years. There’s nothing that will bring out the cynic in a person like working in a field with lots of conflicts of interest. Having experienced cancer for nearly two years now, I’m beginning to think that the medical oncology field may be worse than Wall Street.
May 19, 2012 I figured that I would start a blog to talk about having cancer. I am a 53 year old woman from New York City who was diagnosed with a rare form of gastrointestinal cancer called carcinoid in August 2010 when I was 51. Carcinoids are a form of neuroendocrine cancers, the same type of cancer that Steve Jobs died from. I was diagnosed by accident after having a sonogram because my ob-gyn thought I might have an enlarged spleen. The sonogram found widespread tumors throughout my mid-gut area. The initial thoughts were that I had lymphoma.My Dr sent me to an oncologist-hematologist who specialized in lymphoma; I’ll call him Dr L.Dr L did an exam and asked about symptoms and said I did not exhibit any symptoms of lymphoma.He said we needed to do needle biopsy to find out what was going on in my abdominal area.I then had what is called a CT guided needle biopsy whereby they stick a long needle into the abdominal area closest to a tumor. They then take cells from the tumor to send to a lab to determine the type of cancer.
I’ve always been pretty healthy and never had a sonogram, CT scan or any sort of cancer threat.No one in my family has cancer so I’ve never been through it with anyone else.
When the biopsy came back, Dr L said that it was carcinoid and that if I had to have cancer, this was “a good kind to have because it is slow growing”.He asked if I had any diarrhea, flushing or wheezing.It turns out that I did have occasional flushing (once about every 2 months or so for a few minutes, generally around mealtime); nothing that I would ever bring up with a doc, since it did not bother me. Until he mentioned flushing, I never would have thought of it.He said that it was important to find the primary tumor, the location where the cancer started before it metastasized.Dr L wanted to do an endoscopy/colonoscopy to look for the primary tumor.I protested about the colonoscopy because I had just had one about 8 months earlier after I had turned 50 to determine a baseline for diagnostic purposes.Both my primary care doc and Dr L believed I should have the second colonoscopy. So I had the endoscopy/colonoscopy and they did not find the primary tumor – so much for having 2 colonoscopies in one year!I asked Dr L who he would send his wife or daughter to if they had carcinoids and he mentioned Dr. Jekyll (not his real name!) at Memorial Sloan Kettering (MSKCC) – he was the “best in the world” at treating this disease.
Meanwhile, the reason I had originally gone to my ob-gyn was because I had uterine fibroids and they were causing extreme pain and bleeding.I needed a hysterectomy.I had spent about 2 months getting the above tests after the sonogram and my ob-gyn was reluctant to operate until I got a definitive diagnosis and he knew it would be safe.I had the hysterectomy in early October 2010.That surgery was the best thing that happened to me that year.I have not felt this good for many years!Good riddance uterus!
After a month of recovery from the hysterectomy, I had my first appointment with Dr Jekyll at MSKCC.My appointment was at to get processed with insurance, etc. and my doc appointment was at .I had some blood drawn and then was moved into an examining room.A fellow came in about to examine me and ask about my symptoms.Dr. Jekyll then came in and introduced himself.He spent about 8 minutes asking some questions and giving me some information about Sandostatin, the drug he thought I should be taking.He answered a few of my questions but most of his answers were “I don’t know”.He said he would be giving me a subcutaneous shot of 550 mc of sandostatin to see how I tolerate the drug.If I tolerated it, he would start me on a once a month shot of 20 mg of Sandostatin LAR.That was it and then the nurse came in to give me the shot.She asked me to wait about 20 minutes because she wanted to make sure that I was not having any reaction to the medication or getting a rash.I left MSKCC at about having spent 4 hours there and seeing the Dr. for less than 10 minutes.I started walking toward my office which was about 10 blocks away and within a block of MSKCC felt urine running down my legs.I ran into a nearby hotel to go to the ladies room to clean up and then went on to work. For the rest of the day I was having the feeling of a urinary tract infection with feelings that I had to urinate - and then not being able to! This was quite uncomfortable.
I emailed Dr Jekyll about this problem the next day (the problem had gotten better within 12 hours). His nurse called me back and said she had never seen this reaction and that I could discuss it with the doc when I came in the next week.At the following appointment, Dr Jekyll said he had never seen anyone with urinary incontinence from taking Sandostatin He thought that “maybe I was nervous about coming to MSKCC and that is why I had the problem”.He then gave a much lower dose of 100 mc and told me to come back the following week.The schedule was to go weekly and give me a higher dose until he determined my tolerance.I had the urinary problem again when my dose got higher.I started on Sandostatin LAR 10 mg in January 2011.I moved from weekly to monthly appointments but I was quite uncomfortable with Dr Jekyll.The reason I call him Dr Jekyll is because he would be arrogant and very obnoxious for some appointments with a zero tolerance policy for questions and then once in a blue moon, he would be quite professional and courteous.Just when I felt I needed to fire Dr Jekyll, I would have a good appointment and then feel ok with him.
Because of my discomfort with Dr Jekyll, I made an appointment with another carcinoid expert, Dr Warner at Mount SinaiHospital.Dr Warner does not take new patients but sees them on a consulting basis and will recommend docs who work with him.Mount Sinai takes a much more aggressive approach to this disease than MSKCC. I saw Dr Warner in June 2011 and he was very informative and spent about 3 hours with me.I was still trying to get basic knowledge about this disease.He suggested we try to find the primary tumor by doing an octreoscan and a small bowel x-ray series.He suggested that a debulking surgery may be warranted and that my gallbladder should be removed and perhaps some sort of chemotherapy might help.He also suggested an echocardiogram and that I increase my dosage of Sandostatin LAR to 20 mg. per month.Given my lack of symptoms, I was scared by the invasiveness of all that he was recommending.I went back to Dr Jekyll who agreed to increase my Sandostatin dose to 20 mg. and to give me an echocardiogram.I continued to see Dr Jekyll even though I thought he was terrible.I took down all the doc names Dr Warner gave me and started checking them out.Most did not take my insurance and/or they seemed older than I was comfortable with. I work in corporate America where the normal retirement age is 65 so I am a bit nervous about seeing docs who are more than 5-10 years older than that. Finally, after 15 months and a very contentious appointment where I waited 3 hours to see Dr Jekyll and he would not give me my 5-HIAA results because it “didn’t mean anything”. I finally fired him in February 2012.
MSKCC takes a “watch and wait” approach to carcinoid cancer as opposed to a more aggressive treatment plan.Their view is that the primary tumor is not important, and the only thing that matters is whether the tumors are secreting hormones and that is what they need to treat.I was happy with the “watch and wait” approach since I was asymptomatic.
I started in March 2012 with Dr Ratner who works at Mount Sinai and is on Dr. Warner's list of appropriate referrals.This is still a new experience and so far I like the doc. His nurses seem competent with giving Sandostatin shots. My major problem is with his front desk, which has twice scheduled me for appointments on days he is not going to be in the office!I found out that he would not be in the office when I call to confirm the day before the appointment (twice).I’m not sure whether the Dr is not telling the front desk when he is coming in or whether they don’t keep track well.
In summary, I have not had any progression of tumors and no symptoms since being diagnosed in 2010.The flushing has receded since starting Sandostatin LAR.At this point, I am quite healthy and am waiting to see if Dr. Ratner has a new or different treatment plan for me-or if he will honor his appointments.
I’d like to use this blog as a way to talk about my issues and treatments, to inform others, to solicit opinions on good docs, helpful treatments and any other thoughts as I go through my carcinoid journey.
La nuove ricerche sull’efficacia del bicarbonato di sodio e di altri composti con proprietà anti-acide nella cura e regressione delle malattie tumorali
Da vari anni la vicenda del dottor Tullio Simoncini è balzata agli onori della gloria mediatica e molte persone la ricorderanno senz’altro. Simoncini è il medico di Roma radiato dall’Ordine parecchio tempo fa con varie accuse di malasanità conseguenti il suo uso terapeutico del bicarbonato di sodio per curare alcune forme di tumore. Secondo gli studi e la lunga pratica clinica del dottor Simoncini, infatti, ci sarebbe una correlazione tra il terreno acido dell’organismo e l’instaurazione di colonie di funghi che porterebbe poi allo sviluppo del cancro, cancro che non è altro quindi che un’infezione fungina degenerata e inarrestabile. Ripristinando il corretto equilibrio basico e intervenendo con l’apporto di sostanze antiacide, quali appunto il bicarbonato, si ottiene un rallentamento del progredire canceroso e, se preso in tempo, anche la guarigione. Su questa dinamica terapeutica alcuni mass media abituati a ridicolizzare i processi troppo semplici che non possono essere ricondotti all’alveo della pura scienza ipertecnologica si sono scatenati schernendo l’idea stessa di partenza e coloro che se ne sono fatti portavoce, senza nemmeno fare concessioni, come invece ha auspicato notoriamente A. Einstein, all’importanza nella scienza di saper sempre mettere in discussione ogni parvente verità scientifica. Terapia antiacida in funzione antitumorale: le recenti ricerche “ufficiali” Qualche anno dopo la drammatica uscita dalla scena del dottor Simoncini ecco che apprendiamo da fonti autorevoli ed esenti da ogni “sospetto” che la terapia antiacida in funzione antitumorale è allo studio in vari centri di ricerca nel mondo e che Cancer Research e altre riviste scientifiche internazionali iniziano a parlarne e a considerare i possibili sviluppi di farmaci a base di molecole che ripristinano il corretto equilibrio acido-basico dell’organismo, e in particolare della zona colpita dal tumore, inibendo la sua crescita e arrestandola. Il fiore della nuova terapia è sbocciato alla consapevolezza generale in occasione del primo simposio dell’International society for proton dynamics in cancer (Ispdc), tenutosi a Roma il 27 settembre 2010. Gli illustratori di questa “scoperta” sono stati gli scienziati dell’Istituto superiore di sanità che stanno lavorando all’ipotesi di utilizzare gli antiacidi (bicarbonato compreso), e in particolare gli inibitori della pompa protonica solitamente adoperati per le ulcere gastriche, in funzione antitumorale al posto dei chemioterapici. In una intervista rilasciata da Stefano Fais a Repubblica, il presidente Ispdc e membro del dipartimento del farmaco dell’Iss, afferma che «l’acidità è un meccanismo che il cancro usa per isolarsi da tutto il resto, farmaci compresi. Ma le cellule tumorali, per difendersi a loro volta da questo ambiente acido, fanno iperfunzionare le pompe protoniche che pompano protoni H+. Se si bloccano queste pompe, la cellula tumorale rimane disarmata di fronte all’acidità, e finisce per morire autodigerendosi». Ossia la “nuova” idea base di partenza è che i tumori sono acidi e che da lì occorre iniziare.
Scienza e Conoscenza giunge allaquarantesima uscita e ci sembra proprio di averne fatta di strada dal primo numero apparso oltre dieci anni fa. Il quarantesimo numero lo festeggiamo con la messa on line del nuovissimo sito internet, rinnovato nella grafica, ma soprattutto nelle funzionalità e nei servizi destinati ai lettori e agli abbonati.Scienza e Conoscenza 40 è dedicato al tema del ph ovvero alla questionedell'acidità dell'organismo come causa della genesi di molte malattie nel corpo umano: un paradigma interessante e sempre più condiviso all'interno del mondo scientifico che pare rispondere a molti quesiti biologici sinora rimasti irrisolti. In questo numero trovate una presentazione dell'approccio dietico acido-base, le nuove ricerche relative all'efficacia del bicarbonato di sodio e di altri composti con proprietà anti-acide nella cura e regressione delle malattie tumorali, la rubrica di medicina dell'informazione curata dal dottor Baldari centrata sulle intolleranze alimentari e la loro risoluzione. E siccome il primo nostro numtrimento non è il cibo, bensì il respiro, vi invitiamo con il cuore a leggere l'interessante intervista del maestro di Yoga Kundalini Ram Rattan Singh e il lavoro che sta svolgendo la dottoressa Fiamma Ferraro con il metodo Buteyko. Speriamo che questo focus su ciò che portiamo dentro al nostro corpo sia gradito a tutti voi che continuate a leggerci e sostenerci con entusiasmo.
