The Cure to Cancer Summit!

Posted by thomenda7xx on Wednesday, August 28, 2013



The pH Miracle for Cancer Summit

SUBJECT: The pH Miracle for Cancer book release and The Cure to Cancer Summit!
"Join me for the first ever Cure to Cancer Summit!"
"How Can We Reverse the Cancer Epidemic?"
"Reversing the Cancer Epidemic"
"The Cancer Epidemic- Integrative and Alternative Answers"
"Answers to Cancer"

Dear Friends and Family:

I am thrilled to invite you to join me in the most comprehensive and integrative international online summit on cancer and it's possible cures. The Cure to Cancer Summit will be featuring world experts in the area of cancer, cancer research, health, healing, and vital living, who will share with you the most up to date and fascinating information on integrative solutions to cancer. I am honored to be one of the speakers on the Cure to Cancer Summit sharing alternative solutions… and it's all Free!

To learn more, go to: http://thecuretocancersummit.com/dap/a/?a=24

Renowned speakers include:

Dr. Gabriel Cousens: M.D. is the founder and director of the Tree of Life Foundation. He is a holistic medical doctor, a psychiatrist and family therapist, and a licensed homeopathic physician. Dr. Cousens received his M.D. degree from Columbia Medical School in 1969 and completed his psychiatry residency in 1973. He is also in the National Football Hall of Fame as the Captain-Linebacker of his undefeated college team. He was the Chief Mental Health Consultant for the Sonoma County Operation Head Start and a consultant for the California State Department of Mental Health.

Dr. Robert Young; Over the past two and a half decades, has been widely recognized as one of the top research scientists in the world. Throughout his career, his research has been focused at the cellular level. Specializing in cellular nutrition, Dr. Young has devoted his life to researching the true causes of "disease," subsequently developing "The New Biology™" to help people balance their life.  Aside from his work as an author, Dr. Young has been honored to speak at Central University for Nationalities - Beijing (below), China Women's College - Beijing, All-China Women's Federation - Beijing, Brigham Young University, Utah Valley State College, University of Minnesota, University of Hartford, Olin University, Sacred Heart University of Boston, Oxford University - U.K., Harvard University (bottom right), the University of Vienna, and the University of Victoria.  September 1st, 2013, Dr. Young will be pre-launching his new book, The pH Miracle for Cancer - The Cure to Cancer!  You can order this book on-line at:

http://www.phmiracleliving.com/c-25-books-dvds-audios.aspx

Markus Rothkranz; At age 9 Markus gave a speech on exponential evolution. At 13 he built a 180 sq ft scale model of the entire Walt Disney World Magic Kingdom. By 15 he was making movies with car stunts &explosions. At 16 he won an automotive design contest. By 17 he was in advanced electronics and hypothetical physics. By 18 he copied a famous masters oil painting stroke for stroke in only a few days. By 19, he as working with architectural firms. By 23 he was doing Hollywood FX design work on films like Total Recall, Die Hard, Red Planet. In 1994 he wrote and directed his own 2 million dollar worldwide motion picture, doing much of his own cinematography and personally built over 200 miniature models. By 46 he proved anti-aging and disease eradication and is now set for his greatest undertaking ever- the World Health Project –healing the world and awakening the planet to a new way of living in body,  mind and spirit. Fueled by undying love, spiritual magic and the passion of atrue Leo, Markus is about to give the world a show it will never forget.

Dr. Janet Hranicky, Ph.D.; Is the Founder and President of The American Health Institute, Inc. She has been a leading pioneer in the field of Psycho-Neuro-Immunology and Cancer. As an associate of the late renowned Radiation Oncologist, O.Carl Simonton, M.D. from 1979—2009, she was involved in the longest running Mind/Body Treatment Program for Cancer in the world at the Simonton Cancer Center. She has applied her clinical experience and research from working with thousands of people with cancer and training healthcare professionals internationally over the last 30 years to an integrative model of cancer treatment that incorporates her background in Behavioral Medicine with a number of Integrative and Alternative Therapies based on core principals in Functional Medicine, Bio-Energetic Regeneration Medicine, Integrative Bio-Physics, and Nutritional Science.


Ty Bollinger; is a health freedom advocate, cancer researcher, former competitive bodybuilder and author. After losing several family members to cancer, he refused to accept the notion that chemotherapy, radiation, and surgery were the most effective treatments available for cancer patients. He began a quest to learn all he possibly could about alternative cancer treatments and the medical industry. What he uncovered was shocking. There is ample evidence to support the allegation that the "war on cancer" is largely a fraud and that multinational pharmaceutical companies are "running the show."

Dr. Leigh Erin Connealy, M.D.; Leigh Erin Connealy, MD attended the University of Texas School of Public Health, and then attended the University of Health Sciences Chicago Medical School. She completed her post-graduate training at the Harbor/UCLA Medical Center in Los Angeles, California.  Dr. Connealy soon realized that conventional medicine had very limited returns and did not always improve the health of her patients. Her patients were hungry for alternative approaches for improving their health. This led her to study integrative and complementary therapies, and since then she has revolutionized the landscape of medicine. Dr. Connealy feels that we must treat the patientwith the disease and not the disease of the patient. She has discovered that many factors contribute to the disease process; therefore, many modalities must be used to reverse it.

Burton Goldberg; What put Burton Goldberg on the fast track to national prominence was the 1994 publication of his now best-selling Alternative Medicine: The Definitive Guide, produced by his own publishing company. With over 750,000 copies in print, this 1,250 page reference work on howto treat 200 health conditions with alternative medicine has been hailedas “the bible of alternative medicine.” A second, completely revised edition was published by Ten Speed Press of Berkeley, CA in 2002. Burtonis  is on a mission to reform conventional medicine and to help people reclaim their health. He’s a dynamo, traveling, speaking, and teaching all over the country three weeks out of every month. You may have seen him on TV in the U.S. or Canada.

And many others!


Join us as our expert speakers share..

• A variety of alternative cancer therapies you've probably never heard about
• An array of integrative approaches that combine conventional and
complementary treatments
• Natural healing approaches to reverse disease or avoid it in the first place
• Shocking cancer facts and statistics
• How to balance your PH levels- a key to reversing chronic illness
• A variety of nutritional approaches to healing
• How dental toxicity can contribute to degenerative disease
• The power of a mind/body approach to healing from cancer
• How emotions play a major role in the onset of cancer
• How to shift your consciousness to facilitate healing
• The role of spiritual healing in reversing cancer
• Cancer survivor secrets to activating your inner guide
• How regeneration can keep you healthy beyond the age of 100
• And so much more!

Register for the Cure to Cancer Summit here;
http://thecuretocancersummit.com/dap/a/?a=24

The Summit is hosted by Jean Swann.  Jean is a Leader in the Holistic Health Field, with a background in Print and Broadcast Journalism. Inspired to share new paradigms with a worldwide audience, Jean combined her greatest passions into creation of The Wisdom Show. This rare combination of talents allows Jean to offer a unique perspective for listeners. In her private health practice, Jean helps clients identify and heal core un-erlying physical, mental, emotional and spiritual issues. Jean serve as a passionate catalyst for the breakthroughs and “aha” moments that change lives. She incorporates many holistic modalities, including homeopathy, quantum biofeedback, aromatherapy, Reiki, The ta Healing and nutritional counseling.

The Summit is produced by Nathan Crane, Founder of The Panacea Community, Director of Panacea Life School and author of a best selling anthology, 27 Flavors of Fulfillment; How to Live Life to the Fullest!

If you have any questions, feel free to contact me, or Nathan and Jean from the Cure to Cancer Summit.

KIndest regards,

Dr Robert O. Young
info@phmiracleliving.com
www.phmiracleliving.com

Join me on the first ever worldwide free Cure to Cancer Summit here:

http://thecuretocancersummit.com/dap/a/?a=24

Don't forget to pre-order The pH Miracle for Cancer - The Cure to Cancer,
September 1st at:

http://www.phmiracleliving.com/c-25-books-dvds-audios.aspx
More aboutThe Cure to Cancer Summit!

The Big Wedding!

Posted by thomenda7xx on Monday, August 26, 2013

Saturday was my niece’s wedding!  It was a big fancy affair in Boston.  The weather was perfect and the bride and groom were very happy.  My brother (father of the bride) spent the whole last year trying to convince Erin to go to Las Vegas and elope and came up with a cheaper alternative to all of her wedding ideas. That was all to no avail as the wedding was in a beautiful location right on the Boston Harbor with all the accoutrements. 
 
Everything was excellent – the company, food and entertainment.  A good time was had by all.

When I started going to Dana Farber for my cancer care in January, I said to myself that if they said I needed surgery, I would have it because the people I have spoken with who are carcinoid patients from Dana Farber are not always recommended for surgery, as they are at some other places.  When they did recommend me for surgery last April, I said that I would like to hold off on that until after my niece’s wedding in August.  Both Drs. Chan and Clancy thought that I should do it sooner.   I needed to get myself comfortable with the concept of surgery and I wanted to be in good condition for Erin’s wedding so that I did not take any undue attention away from the bride by being sick Aunt Beth.  I also did not want to have surgery in the summer when a lot of medical personnel are new in their roles and/or on vacation.  Since I am asymptomatic, I figured it would be ok.  So far so good.  Today I came back to work and one of my coworkers asked me what I will be doing now that the wedding is over and I said focusing on my upcoming surgery – not quite as fun!

At the wedding, several people came up to me and started asking questions about my cancer.  These were people I did not know or knew only as acquaintances.  I was not really in the mood to talk about my cancer at the wedding.  I deferred the cancer talk and changed the subject.  Since I have a small family, they must have figured that I was the Aunt with cancer.   Ugh…

So, while Erin and John are honeymooning in Europe, I will start thinking about listening to those calming meditations about reframing my thoughts to a more positive place and positioning myself for surgical success.  My pre-op appointment is on September 6thso that’s my next engagement before the surgery.  Here’s to keeping myself calm and serene in the upcoming weeks.

 

 


More aboutThe Big Wedding!

Reserach Now Links Acidic Diets and Cancer Validating Dr. Robert O. Young's 30 Years of Reserach!

Posted by thomenda7xx on Sunday, August 25, 2013


The Arizona Respiratory Center at the University of Arizona found, “Acidogenic diets, which are typically high in animal protein and salt and low in fruits and vegetables, can lead to a sub-clinical or low-grade state of metabolic acidosis.” These are are recent studies validating Dr. Robert O. Young's 30 years of research that showa the unarguable link between acidity in the body and increased risk for cancer

Read more: http://naturalsociety.com/alkalinity-treat-disease-change-ph-balance/#ixzz2d1j07Y62
Follow us: @naturalsociety on Twitter | NaturalSociety on Facebook


 2012 Aug 1;9(1):72. doi: 10.1186/1743-7075-9-72.

Examining the relationship between diet-induced acidosis and cancer.

Source

Arizona Respiratory Center, University of Arizona, 1501 N, Campbell Ave,, Suite 2349, PO Box 245030, Tucson, Arizona 85724, USA. robeyi@email.arizona.edu.

Abstract

Increased cancer risk is associated with select dietary factors. Dietary lifestyles can alter systemic acid-base balance over time. Acidogenic diets, which are typically high in animal protein and salt and low in fruits and vegetables, can lead to a sub-clinical or low-grade state of metabolic acidosis. The relationship between diet and cancer risk prompts questions about the role of acidosis in the initiation and progression of cancer. Cancer is triggered by genetic and epigenetic perturbations in the normal cell, but it has become clear that microenvironmental and systemic factors exert modifying effects on cancer cell development. While there are no studies showing a direct link between diet-induced acidosis and cancer, acid-base disequilibrium has been shown to modulate molecular activity including adrenal glucocorticoid, insulin growth factor (IGF-1), and adipocyte cytokine signaling, dysregulated cellular metabolism, and osteoclast activation, which may serve as intermediary or downstream effectors of carcinogenesis or tumor promotion. In short, diet-induced acidosis may influence molecular activities at the cellular level that promote carcinogenesis or tumor progression. This review defines the relationship between dietary lifestyle and acid-base balance and discusses the potential consequences of diet-induced acidosis and cancer occurrence or progression.
PMID:
 
22853725
 
[PubMed] 
PMCID:
 
PMC3571898
 
Free PMC Article
More aboutReserach Now Links Acidic Diets and Cancer Validating Dr. Robert O. Young's 30 Years of Reserach!

Dr. Robert O. Young's Acid Theory for Pancreatic Cancer is Validated by Recent Study

Posted by thomenda7xx

The human body and all its  fluids and tissues are most optimum at around 7.365 pH. Otherwise, acidosis, a condition wherein the body becomes overly acidic, ensues. Many studies have shown that acute acidosis causes an increase in bacteria, yeast,  and mold to take over and spark degenerative diseases like, diabetes, cancer, aids, arteriosclerosis, chronic fatigue, and more. For instance, pancreatic cells become more cancerous and tumorigenic with high acid pH levels in the body. 

Constitutive and Inducible Interleukin 8 Expression by Hypoxia and Acidosis Renders Human Pancreatic Cancer Cells More Tumorigenic and Metastatic1

  1. Qian Shi
  2. James L. Abbruzzese
  3. Suyun Huang
  4. Isaiah J. Fidler
  5. Qinghua Xiong and
  6. Keping Xie2
+Author Affiliations
  1. Departments of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology and Digestive Diseases [Q. S., J. L. A., Q. X., K. X.] and Cancer Biology [Q. S., S. H., I. J. F., K. X.], The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas 77030

    Abstract

    The role and regulation of interleukin 8 (IL-8) in the growth and metastasis of SG, FG, and L3.3 variants derived from COLO 357 human pancreatic cancer cells were determined. After orthotopic implantation in the pancreas of nude mice, SG cells produced the smallest tumors, whereas L3.3 cells produced the largest tumors. SG cells produced no liver metastasis, whereas FG cells produced numerous liver metastases, and L3.3 cells produced more and larger liver metastases. In vitro analysis of IL-8 expression indicated that SG cells expressed the lowest level of IL-8 gene expression as determined by both Northern blot analysis and ELISA, whereas L3.3 cells expressed the highest level of IL-8. Immunohistochemical analysis of tumor lesions indicated that IL-8 overexpression was predominant in the regions surrounding necrotic areas, where cells were exposed to low oxygen tension (hypoxia) and acidic pH. In vitro treatment of FG tumor cells with hypoxia or acidosis led to an increased expression of IL-8. To directly determine the role of IL-8 in the growth and metastasis of pancreatic cancer, FG cells were transfected with IL-8 sense or antisense oligonucleotide expression vectors. Theneo-resistance gene-transfected FG cells were used as controls. Decreased IL-8 expression after transfection with IL-8 antisense oligonucleotide expression vector retarded the growth of FG cells in mice after intrapancreatic implantation, which correlated with decreased tumor angiogenesis. Our data demonstrated that hypoxia and acidosis contribute to the overexpression of IL-8, which in turn plays an important role in tumor angiogenesis and contributes significantly to the aggressive biology of human pancreatic cancer.

    Footnotes

    • The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
    • 1 This work was supported in part by the Multidisciplinary Pancreatic Program Research Grant and Cancer Center Support Core Grant CA 16672 (to K. X.). Q. S. is supported by the Smith Education Fund of The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center.
    • 2 To whom requests for reprints should be addressed, at Departments of Gastrointestinal Oncology and Cancer Biology, Box 078, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Houston, Texas 77030. Phone: (713) 792-2013; Fax: (713) 745-1163; E-mail: kepxie@notes.mdacc.tmc.edu.
    • 3 The abbreviations used are: IL, interleukin; TNF, tumor necrosis factor; VEGF, vascular endothelial growth factor; HIF, hypoxia-inducible factor; NF, nuclear factor.
      • Accepted August 18, 1999.
      • Received May 20, 1999.
      • Revision received August 13, 1999.
    More aboutDr. Robert O. Young's Acid Theory for Pancreatic Cancer is Validated by Recent Study

    The Cause of Polio - Mass Acidic Poisoning!

    Posted by thomenda7xx on Saturday, August 24, 2013


    The Cause Of Polio - Mass Acidic Poisoning

    Polio in the United States - Graphic Timeline: US 1870 - 1998

    This graph shows polio in the United States in a context rarely (if ever) portrayed since Biskind, the environmental context. "DDT" and "DDT-like chemicals" are selected for this graph as the least complex way to represent the a broad overview of the evolution of the technology of, and potential for, mass poisoning. Some prominent organochlorines are chlorobenzene, PCBs (polychlorinated biphenyls) and DDT (dichloro-diphenyl-trichloroethane). Chlorobenzene is a precursor, a foundational compound used in the production of many industrial organochlorines. In the U.S., high production of chlorobenzene began in 1915, soon after the beginning of World War I.

    This graph is a compilation of new cases per year (not incidence, as portrayed elsewhere herein). The data for the last half of the 20th century was gathered from U.S. Vital Statistics. The very earliest numbers, from 1887 to about 1904, and the postpolio numbers, are interpolated from the general historical commentary regarding those periods (see bibliography on Homepage and NYC Health Commissioner Haden Emerson's compilations). While the graph is not perfectly accurate, due to changing methods of diagnoses and record-keeping within the medical system, it does give a reliable overall picture of polio cases in terms of known literature and records.

    The source for the U.S. and Swiss discoveries of paralysis in calves is from Van Nostrand's Encyclopedia of Science and Engineering (1995), vol. 5, p1725. The phrase "Pesticides As A Panacea: 1942-1962" is a subtitle found in Encyclopedia Britannica, Macropaedia (1986). Refer to other graphs (Overview) for specific pesticide comparisons with polio incidence.

    In 1915 Hooker Electrochemical began massive, unprecedented production of chlorobenzene (8,200 metric tons per year) and Dow Chemical began large-scale production soon thereafter. Chlorobenzenes are the basis for picric acid explosive used in World War I. They have also been used in the manufacture of wood treatments, war gas, herbicides, insecticides, bactericide, moth control, and polymer resins. (Mono)chlorobenzene is the base compound for DDT production. Currently in the U.S., 15 million pounds of p-dichlorobenzene production goes into room deodorants. According to Duesberg, CDC's investigation into Legionnaires disease ignored toxic cause and created a new false field of study regarding the Legionella bacterium.

    The sudden surge of chlorobenzene production coincides in time and place (1915, Niagara Falls) to be considered as probable cause for the epidemic of central nerve system diseases that followed the next year in the New York City region. This epidemic lasted only six months, June to November, with 82% of the cases occurring in just 8 weeks. While polio literature terms this a world-wide polio epidemic, it was peculiarly a phenomena of the U.S. and was especially prominent in the New York City region. This is strange behavior for a supposedly predatory poliovirus, in an era, a continent, wholly unprotected by miracle vaccines.

    The number of new cases for 1916 (40,485) were calculated by multiplying the U.S. incidence rate by the U.S. population. The number seems too high because of Naomi Rogers' statements that worldwide new cases in 1916 were 27,000, that two-thirds of world polio new cases were in the U.S. and that New York City new cases were 9,000. While this discrepancy exists, the data is still useful for showing relative case numbers and/or incidence for the early 20th century.

    Both polio epidemics occurred two years after the beginning of a world war, if we use the dates of the epidemics, 1916 and 1942.

    DDT and "DDT-like chemicals" are used to represent the major organochlorine pesticides and organochlorines of similar neurotoxic character. Most of the industrial organochlorines can produce CNS disease symptoms similar to polio. Refer to the Overview for graphs on DDT and other neurotoxic pesticides compared to polio incidence.

    Critique of Dominant Images

    It certainly appears, from the graph, that the vaccination programs arrived a few years too late to be credited for declining polio case numbers. The programs were close enough, however, for media to shoehorn them into their historical position. This quote from Time Magazine (March 28, 1994) is a typical example:

    The great postwar epidemic peaked in the U.S. in 1952, when more than 20,000 children were paralyzed by polio and it tapered off in the early '60s, after the Salk vaccine and then the Sabin oral version were introduced.

    This smooth, loaded phrase, framed with glossy photos and clever captions, goes down like lubricated jello. However, if we contain our admiration, and review the actual data, we realize that the great polio epidemic actually occurred from 1942 (or gradually, beginning decades earlier) to 1962, that is, it was not a "postwar epidemic". The epidemic declined not "in the early '60s", but a full decade earlier, in the early 1950s. Polio cases per year did not "taper off... after the Salk vaccine" as Time would have us believe -- new cases per year dove resolutely downward two years before the Salk vaccine field trials and four years before the vaccination programs were firmly underway. The decline of polio actually occurred after heated discussions regarding the dangers of DDT that began with in-house government/industry reviews of DDT in 1951, following Biskind and other's criticism of pesticides which began in 1949. These discussions were followed by a phase-out through industry compliance, a huge shift of sales to third-world countries, a phase-in of less-persistent pesticides, which was facilitated by legislation in 1954 and 1956, a renewed public image regarding the proper use and dangers of pesticides, the cancellation of DDT registration by 1968, and eventually the official ban of many of the persistent organochlorine pesticides by 1972 (in U.S. and developed countries).

    Notice that while pesticide production directly correlates with new polio cases per year through every peak and valley, the Salk vaccine enters only after polio's decline. Salk's point of entry is not sufficient evidence to be routinely offered as proof for the victory of vaccines over the poliovirus, as Time implies, and as implied by Hayes and Laws, and virtually all other presentations of polio history in whatever media or educational forum.

    The molecular biologist, Peter Duesberg, in his attempt to give Modern Medicine some credence with regard to virus causality (before refuting HIV causality with AIDS), apparently felt he could assume, in Inventing the AIDS Virus, that,

    ...the sudden, frightening polio epidemic that exploded in the Western nations, brought home by troops returning from the Pacific theater in 1945.

    Yet a glance at the graph show his statement to be inaccurate. Polio was entrenched in the U.S. long before returning troops, and the increased polio cases per year correlate much more consistently with pesticide production (see Overview) than returning troops. A rise in new cases per year that peaked in 1945 can be clearly attributed to the government's release of war surplus DDT to the public market in 1945, not vague data about "troops returning from the Pacific theater in 1945". The troops were heavily treated with DDT years before the U.S. civilian population and as can be expected, in light of the acidic poison-theory, the troops suffered unusually high polio incidence rates when compared to the non-treated populations where they were stationed, and soldiers based in the U.S. (Biskind). The unusual drama and rash assumption that fills this excerpt of Duesberg's writings gives a sense that he has taken the whole package of ingrained polio images for granted.

    Pesticide Phase-out and Vaccinations

    DDT and BHC were phased out from the developed nations and at the same time vaccination programs were dramatically credited with saving these countries from the ravages of the poliovirus (see Homepage). However, the banned pesticides continued with higher than ever total distribution in the under-developed countries thanks to W.H.O.'s anti-mosquito campaigns, where to this day acute flaccid paralysis (AFP), polio, and DDT/BHC still prevail. DDT application, DDT phase-out programs, and polio vaccination programs are all being directed in these countries concurrently by the World Health Organization with little or no success.

    Registration for DDT was canceled in 1968. and DDT was banned by the EPA in 1972 -- after the major organochlorines (DDT, BHC) had been gradually phased out of the U.S. market by the chemical industry and replaced with the less environmentally persistent pesticides, the organophosphates.

    Post-polio

    Pesticides


    In 1983, via new legislation, DDT was allowed back into the U.S. marketplace, but only in pesticide blends. Within only a few months of this re-entry, a new kind of polio epidemic suddenly occurred. It was labeled "post-polio", the re-emergence of polio symptoms in former victims. This has involved approximately 600,000 victims and is the graph above. Like most of the data, this correlation is not even a whisper in the mainstream media.

    Central nervous system diseases other than polio continue in the U.S. and throughout the world: acute flaccid paralysis, chronic fatigue syndrome, encephalitis, meningitis, muscular sclerosis, and rarely in humans, rabies.
    The harsh realities of government policy are stated in Casarett and Doull's Toxicology (1996):

    Although government agencies and industry have been slow in their reevaluation of a vast array of pesticides in use, reassessment often comes in the wake of or concomitant with some recently disclosed adverse environmental or health effect.

    This after-the-fact approach to pesticide poisoning is puzzling enough without questioning Casarett and Doull's careful usage of the words: "often", "some", "recently", and "disclosed".

    The acidic environmental correlations of post-polio are overlooked. Searching PubMed has been in vain. Recently, however, I found online a paper entitled "The Environmental Aspects Of The Post Polio Syndrome". It's website modification date is May, 1999. This article establishes a strong correlation between environmental factors and post-polio (see http://www.aehf.com/articles/A56.htm).

    By searching PubMed on "environment and post-polio" a listing for the above article was found:

    Rea WJ, Johnson AR, Fenyves E, Butler J.
    Related Articles

    The environmental aspects of the post-polio syndrome.
    Birth Defects Orig Artic Ser. 1987;23(4):173-81. No abstract available.
    PMID: 3620615; UI: 87299998
    No other similar articles were found, and no abstract was available, although it presumably could be ordered from PubMed.

    Poliovirus Presence In Post-Polio

    According to immunity and vaccination theories, if anyone should be immune to polio, it should be former polio victims, however, numerous studies of post-polio victims have found evidence of active poliovirus.
    From NIH's PubMed, four studies:

    PMID: 7611631, UI: 95336052 (London, May, 1995) This study also quotes "a previous study"
    PMID: 7611630, UI: 95336051 (Bethesda, MA, May, 1995)
    PMID: 8818905, UI: 96415998 (Lyon, France, Aug., 1996)

    Polio images are projected as if this data doesn't exist. It does not appear that money is being funneled into these kinds of studies.

    Farr's Law

    Farr's Law requires, for an epidemic to be a valid example of contagion, that the epidemic increase its incidence rates exponentially. Since polio has been ubiquitous since the beginning of human history, its incidence rate should have peaked long ago and universal immunity conferred, if immunity was ever required, and if the poliovirus was actually a predator.

    Polio's non-compliance with Farr's Law is explained by viropathologists with a unique argument, the inverse of the argument usually given to support germ theory. The argument is that the poliovirus, which has been intimate with mankind since the beginning of history, suddenly became estranged from humans because of modern hygiene, and thus humans lost their natural immunity to the virus. So it is modern hygiene and the resulting lack of exposure to the virus that is said to have caused the polio epidemics to rage as never before.

    It is interesting that for only one brief moment, viropathologists are willing to become eco-nutritional types who appreciate the value of natural breast feeding and the importantance of the internal microbiological ecology conferred positively upon humans by dirt.

    Three different promotions of their inverse argument follow:

    (1) The prominent book on polio history by Naomi Rogers, where the inverse argument resides in the title, Dirt and Disease: Polio Before FDR. The language style here is popular.

    (2) In Textbook of Child Neurology (1995), John H. Menkes promotes the inverse argument with scientific language style:

    Poliomyelitis... is less likely to be symptomatic in areas with inadequate sanitation, because poor sanitization is conducive to exposure at an age when lingering transferred maternal immunity can attenuate the clinical picture. (p420)
    (3) In the propaganda film, A Paralyzing Fear: The Story of Polio in America. This was funded by the government and pharmaceutical firms and released in 1998.

    The New York Times (March 4, 1998) reviews the film. It reinforces the fundamental tenets of polio culture, beginning with a quotation from a section that portrays a "vintage film clip":

    "My name is virus poliomyelitis," intones a cultivated, sinister male voice, as a camera pans over fair-weather clouds from which a hollow shadow emerges carrying the silhouette of a crutch. "I consider myself quite an artist, a sort of sculptor," the voice continues. "I specialize in grotesques, twisting and deforming human bodies. That's why I'm called The Crippler."

    Having dramatically demonized the poliovirus, the medical cavalry rides to the rescue:

    ...the epidemics grew steadily worse each year, with the number of new cases climbing from 5,000 in 1933 to 59,000 in 1952. Salvation came in 1954 with the Salk vaccine...

    And the inverse argument is now fit to print:
    The irony of the rise of polio in the 20th century, the movie reports, is that its prevalence was a result of improved sanitation. In grubbier times, babies and very young children developed antibodies to the disease, which had been around forever. A cleaner environment left increasing numbers of children with no natural immunity.

    So The New York Times review concisely presents the standard polio images: the predatory virus, paralytic horror, epidemics, salvation via the Salk vaccine, and a unique exception from Farr's Law. I doubt anyone at NYT actually wrote the piece, rather that it was supplied to the journalist as a suggested article, to be adjusted to the author's style, thus essentially a customized press release.

    Graphic Timeline: U.S. 1912-1970

    The graph provides greater detail for the U.S. period of 1912-1970, and summarizes the vaccination issues mentioned above.

    The Epidemic Intelligence ServiceDuesberg's Inventing The AIDS Virus (1996):[The CDC's] disease-control mission was increasingly being regarded as obsolete, prompting serious discussions about abolishing the CDC altogether.The situation changed in 1949 when the CDC brought on board Alexander Langmuir, an associate professor at the Johns Hopkins University School of Hygiene and Public Health. Langmuir was the CDC's first VIP, bringing with him both his expertise in epidemiology (the statistical study of epidemics) and his high-level connections -- including his security clearance as one of the few scientists privy to the Defense Department's biological warfare program...

    ...Langmuir and talked public officials and Congress into giving the CDC contingent powers to deal with potential emergencies... In July of 1951 he assembled the first class of the Epidemic Intelligence Service (EIS), composed of twenty-three young medical or public health graduates. After six weeks of intensive epidemiological training, these EIS officers were assigned for two years to hospitals or state and local health departments around the country. Upon completing their field experience, EIS alumni were free to pursue any career they desired, on the assumption that their loyalties would remain with the CDC and that they would permanently act as its eyes and ears. The focus of this elite unit was on activism rather than research and was expressed in its symbol -- a shoe sole worn through with a hole. According to British epidemiologist Gordon Stewart, a former CDC consultant, the EIS was nicknamed the "medical CIA."

    The Director Of Polio Research

    The National Foundation For Infantile Paralysis (NFIP) used the "The March Of Dimes" to fund its polio research which lead to the Salk vaccine field trials in 1954. The Director Of Polio Research was Dr. Henry Kumm.

    According to the brief sketch in American Journal of Digestive Diseases, May 1953, Dr. Kumm was born in Wiesbaden, Germany. He came to the U.S. via Britain and became an American citizen in 1945. He had spent 23 years on the staff of the Rockefeller Foundation for Medical Research before joining the NFIP in July, 1951.

    In April 1953, Dr. Kumm replaced Dr. Harry M. Weaver as Director Of Polio Research at NFIP.

    During World War II he had served as civilian consultant to the Surgeon General of the U.S. Army in Italy, directing field studies for the use of DDT against malarial mosquitoes in the marshes near Rome and Naples.

    As Dr. Kumm is a prominent DDT consultant, there is definitely a conflict of interest for this key player in polio research.

    Earlier in his career Dr. Kumm worked extensively on transmission modes of the disease, yaws. He also worked with the Jamaican Yaws Commission. Scobey refers to allegations that arsenic injection treatments for yaws had caused an epidemic of polio in Samoa in 1936.

    It is not presently known to what extent these events also could have compromised Dr. Kumm's position regarding polio.

    Timeline: U.S. 1945-1957

    1945, DDT was released to public and aggressively promoted, against FDA advice.
    March, 1949, Biskind's "Poisoning and the Elusive 'Virus X'" was published.

    April, 1949, Biskind's study on neuropsychiatric manifestations of DDT was published.

    1949 (approx.), Biskind was attacked with blatantly false data.

    December 12, 1950, Biskind presented "Statement" on DDT to the House Of Representatives.

    1950 and 1951, pesticide discussions began with government and industry.

    May, 1951, Scobey's "Is The Public Health Law Responsible For The Poliomyelitis Mystery?", was published.

    July, 1951 the first Epidemic Intelligence Service (EIS) class was assembled. EIS agents began movement into key positions -- in hospitals, government health departments, and media.
    July, 1951 leading DDT consultant, Dr. Kumm, joined the NFIP, as Director Of Polio Research.

    1952 Formulation of the polio vaccine begins. Tens of millions of doses of polio vaccines produced from virus grown in monkey cells infected with SV-40 (Simian Virus #40). Scientists 'perform experiments in laboratories to determine the correct doses of antigen and supplementary chemicals to use in the polio vaccine. (Ironically, since the scientific premise of vaccination is faulty, a 'correct dose of antigen and chemicals' does not exist).

    April, 1952, Scobey's "Statement" on the "Poison Cause Of Poliomyelitis And Obstructions To Its Investigation" to the House Of Representatives was published.

    1952, U.S. DDT/milk studies found DDT causal for paralysis in calves.

    1952, DDT and other persistent pesticides began rapid phase-out in U.S. and other developing countries.

    1953, Swiss DDT/milk studies found DDT causal for paralysis in calves.

    March 26, 1953, Salk vaccine discovery announced, after evaluation of 600 vaccinated persons (Patenting The Sun).

    April, 1953, leading DDT consultant, Dr. Kumm, appointed by Basil O'Connor to Director of Polio Research for NFIP.

    May, 1953, Biskind alleged conspiracy:
    ...virtually the entire apparatus of communication, lay and scientific alike, has been devoted to denying, concealing, suppressing, distorting and attempts to convert into its opposite, the overwhelming evidence. Libel, slander and economic boycott have not been overlooked in this campaign. (Archive Of Pediatrics)

    1954, Salk vaccine field trials began. 423,000 second grade children were vaccinated.

    1954 Salk vaccine begins to be given to school children in Philadelphia.

    1954 Parke-Davis pharmaceutical company combines the DPT shot with Polio vaccine. The new combination of four vaccines is called Quadrigen. (See 1959).

    1954 Reward of $30,000 offered to anyone who proves polio vaccine not a fraud. Not one person was able to claim the reward.

    1954 Mrs. Oveta Culp Hobby, Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare, allows a press photo to be taken during a ceremony declaring Salk vaccine safe.

    1954 Polio rate caused by the vaccine accelerates ten-fold in Massachusetts.

    1954 Eli Lilly company begins renovation of a five-story building in Indianapolis in July 1954 for the production of Salk vaccine. It is in full production by October of 1954. Wyeth, Parke-Davis and others follow suit.
    March, 1955, Salk vaccine field trial declared "successful", HEW licensed the Salk vaccine. Salk promoted as "hero".

    April 12, 1955, Salk vaccine began on large scale.

    April 12-25, Walter Winchell, radio personality, warned of impending vaccine disaster.

    1955 Georgia State public health officers meet in Atlanta (May 1955) to discuss
    what was going wrong with the Salk vaccine program. A U.S. Public Health scientist at the meeting told the group that 'he was not permitted to disclose what had happened because it would jeopardize the investment of the pharmaceutical firms in the vaccine program.'

    April 25, vaccination program encountered disaster via faulty vaccines manufactured by the Cutter Laboratory in California, which were discovered by EIS. The incidence rate (17 per 100,000 for one month) was higher than with that found with other manufacturer's vaccines, yet this rate was not at all an impossibility since incidence rates of over 400 per 100,000 per month were found in Detroit in 1958. The EIS found 204 Cutter polio cases, by assuming contagion, and then highly publicized these cases (Jane Smith, Patenting The Sun) though only 79 cases were documented (Fields Virology). It was decided that because Cutter did not filter its vaccine thoroughly, that tissue particles had contributed to allergic reactions and live polioviruses. Vaccinations were halted. May 13, vaccination program resumed "piecemeal". Eventually over 5 million persons were vaccinated. Salk was demoted to "mere technician". CDC and EIS assumed control of vaccinations.

    1955 Idaho brings its Salk vaccination program to a halt on July 1, 1955.

    Utah does the same on July 12, 1955.

    1955 Massachusetts reports 642% increase in polio since vaccinations began in 1954 with vaccination of 130,000 children. In response, the National Foundation for Infantile Paralysis states that the increase in cases was due to the fact that 'no children were vaccinated there.'

    1955 Massachusetts bans the sale of Salk vaccine.'

    1955 US Surgeon General Scheele admits in a closed session of the AMA that 'Salk polio vaccine is hard to make and no batch can be proven safe before given to children'. Despite this fact, the public is told that the vaccine is safe. The government announces that it has the intention to vaccinate 57 million people before August 1955.
    August 1, 1955, the "aggressive" James Shannon was promoted to director of NIH. He was formerly against the private control of polio research and vaccination programs.

    Late 1955, March Of Dimes announced that since 1938 it had contributed $74,000,000 towards poliovirus research and $174,700,000 towards treatments for virus-diagnosed polio cases.

    1955 American Cancer Society advertising circular states 'cancer will strike one of every four persons now living. More children from 3 to 15 years of age die of cancer than from any other disease.' (50 years before, cancer was unheard of in children). According to the ACS, they are predicting 6.4 million deaths from cancer, compared with 128,000 in 1933--an increase of 6.2 million cases in 22 years. Vaccination, pesticide use and chemical pollution are the main factors that have increased since 1933.

    1956, the Gallup Poll claims that public confidence in the Salk vaccine is 36%. NFIP and the Salk vaccine are in a "valley". Vaccines are thoroughly tested by federal government, yet vaccination programs continue in the U.S.
    1956-1957, NIH, under James Shannon, "takes over polio research".

    1956 Seventeen states in the United States reject their government-supplied Salk polio vaccine.

    1956 US government appropriates $53.6 million to 'aid states in providing free vaccine to people under 20 years of age'.

    1956 Idaho health director Peterson states that polio only struck vaccinated children in areas where there had been no cases of polio since the preceding autumn. In 90% of the cases, the paralysis occurred in the arm in which the vaccine had been injected.

    1956 American Public Health Service announces 168 cases of polio and 6 deaths among those vaccinated. Censorship is then imposed on the reporting of reactions to Salk vaccine.

    1956 Oral polio vaccine developed further by Sabin.

    1956 The US Public Health Service and the National Foundation for Infantile Paralysis (Rockefeller) put on a drive to 'sell' Salk polio vaccine to the public.

    1957, Salk vaccine promoted heavily, implemented in Canada and England.

    By the end of 1958, 72,000,000 had been inoculated. Infants under 5 comprised 51.7% of all paralytic polio cases. Only 55% of persons, below age 40 were vaccinated (52 million). The poliovirus could not be associated with 26% of the non-paralytic polio cases, nor could it be associated in 14% of the paralytic cases. Considering that 47.5% of the cases were non-paralytic, this translates to 42% that could not be protected by the Salk vaccine because their polio was not caused by the poliovirus. This is an argument that all polio is not caused by the poliovirus.

    1959, "Federal action" is used against a chiropractor to prevent dissemination of anti-vaccination information through the U.S. mail (CDC, Polio Packet, 1959).
    To the present, the Salk vaccination program is promoted as victorious, and serves as a proof for the poliovirus theory. It also serves to bolster all other germ theories (regarding predatory microbes) and the general image of Modern Medicine. The pesticide theory is characterized as irresponsible and dangerous.

    Needless to say, the charge that DDT predisposed to poliomyelitis was dropped after the disease was controlled through the use of vaccines. ...such irresponsible claims could produce great harm and, if taken seriously, even interfere with scientific search for true causes and realistic means of preventing the conditions in question. (Hayes and Laws (1991))
    However, Hayes and Laws statement, above, is invalid because, 1) The vaccination programs are irrelevant to the decline of polio, while 2) pesticides correlate perfectly with polio, and 3) Dr. Biskind did not drop his charges, he alleged conspiracy "to convert into its opposite, the overwhelming evidence." The often published Biskind evidently was relegated to self-publishing after 1955.

    Summary

    The non-funded, ostracized theory of poison causality far exceeds all other theories in simplicity, exactitude, and directness regarding correlations within all data areas: dosage, physiology, etiology, epidemiology, economics, and politics.The historical non-relationship between vaccination and paralyitic polio can be viewed graphically, in terms of the official numbers:

    Note: Persistent (low
    biodegradability) pesticides are shown above.
    See Salk Efficacy Index for method.

    More aboutThe Cause of Polio - Mass Acidic Poisoning!